1–10 Product Quality and Warranties A product breaks within weeks of its purchase, and the store does not assist the customer. Explanation: The product may have an implied warranty of merchantability; it must be able to do what it was expected to do. The store must repair, replace, or refund.
Extended warranty does not cover repairs as promised.
Explanation: If the terms of the warranty are unclear or misleading, the company can be held liable for breach of contract.
A customer purchases a “final sale” item that does not work.
Explanation: Final sale items must meet the minimum quality threshold unless they were sold as-is with known defects.
A repair under warranty takes months to complete
Also read:
- https://insightfullawhelp.com/40-key-consumer-protection-law-questions-answered/
- https://insightfullawhelp.com/20-consumer-protection-law-questions-you-should-know/
- https://insightfullawhelp.com/25-faqs-about-consumer-rights-and-their-legal-basis/
Explanation: Warranty obligations may have been breached in allowing such long delays. In this case, the consumer has alternative remedies
A customer is charged for repairs that should have been covered by warranty.
Explanation: The charge of warranty-covered repairs violates the consumer’s rights, and the client may demand a refund.
A product has collapsed after the expiration of the warranty.
Explanation: Unless there is proof that defects occurred during the warranty period, most cases of obligation end with the final date of warranty expiration.
A retailer refuses to honor a manufacturer’s warranty.
Explanation: Retailers may not be obligated to honor manufacturer warranties, but manufacturers must fulfill their terms.
A company denies warranty claims for minor misuse.
Explanation: Companies cannot cancel warranties for technical or collateral misuse.
A “lifetime warranty” product breaks down after 10 years.
Explanation: Lifetime warranties usually refer to the product’s useful life, not the purchaser’s lifetime. Terms need to be defined.
A service contract does not provide expected benefits.
Explanation: Consumers may sue for breach of contract and seek refunds or specific performance.
11–20: Billing and Sales Practices
A consumer is charged twice for a purchase.
ExPLANATION: The merchant must return the overcharge; disputes can go to the bank or credit card company.
Advertising a product is one thing. Selling another thing altogether.
Explanation: Bait-and-switch advertising is illegal; the customer should be able to demand the product advertised or complaint.
Auto-Renew
ExPLANATION: Auto-renewal where the consumer lacks notice is considered a violation in many jurisdictions. The consumer has the right to cancel and then request a refund.
A salesperson misrepresents a product’s features.
Explanation: Misrepresentation can lead to refunds or damages under deceptive trade practices laws.
A customer is charged for unordered goods.
Explanation: Unsolicited goods are considered gifts in many jurisdictions, and the consumer is not obligated to pay.
A company bills a customer for a canceled service.
Explanation: Continuing charges after cancellation can lead to legal action for breach of contract and unfair practices.
A product is advertised at a low price but not available.
Explanation: False advertising laws may require the seller to honor the advertised price or compensate the customer.
A customer disputes fraudulent credit card charges.
Explanation: The card issuer must investigate and resolve disputes under the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA).
A business charges hidden fees not disclosed upfront.
Explanation: Hidden fees violate transparency requirements, and customers can demand refunds or file complaints.
A loan agreement contains ambiguous terms.
Explanation: Truth-in-lending laws require lenders to provide clear terms. Ambiguities can render parts of the agreement invalid.
21–30: Online and Digital Consumer Issues
An online retailer fails to deliver a purchased item.
Explanation: Consumers are entitled to a refund under e-commerce protection laws.
A downloaded app does not work as promised.
Explanation: The seller or platform may be liable for refunds under digital goods protection laws.
An e-retailer does not accept return on defective merchandise.
Explanation: There are requirements for return on defective goods in several jurisdictions even with respect to electronic sales.
A consumer has unwittingly subscribed to a free trial offer with a month to month charge afterward.
Explanation: Failure to properly disclose a charge is unlawful and consumers are able to claim refund.
A peer-to-peer seller misstates an item for sale on a marketplace.
Explanation: Marketplace has processes in place for disputes. The seller is potentially liable under misrepresentation doctrines.
A website collects personal data without consent.
Explanation: Laws like GDPR or CCPA require explicit consent for data collection, allowing consumers to file complaints.
A digital product is removed after purchase without notice.
Explanation: Consumers may demand a refund or replacement under digital rights management laws.
An online ad leads to a phishing scam.
Explanation: Platforms hosting fraudulent ads may be liable if they failed to act on reports of scams.
A consumer is overcharged for an in-app purchase.
Explanation: Platforms must refund incorrect charges under payment processing regulations.
A streaming service increases prices without notice.
Explanation: Price changes must be communicated clearly, allowing consumers to cancel if they disagree.